NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
+124%
0.733 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
