Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000 +1565%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

51W
TDP
28W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT218
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy