CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7808 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+1912%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
DG2-512
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
2
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
3
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060
4
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
5
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
6
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
7
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
8
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla P6
9
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Related News
1
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
2
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
3
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
4
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
5
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
6
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
7
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
8
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
9
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
10
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy