Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
7808 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +1912%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
DG2-512
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy