Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000 +172%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro 1000M
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF108
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N12P-Q1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy