Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000 +1142%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

51W
TDP
42W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G84
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy