Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000 +3390%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 150M
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
384
Shading Units
8
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.120 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.120 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

51W
TDP
10W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G98
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
NB9M-GE
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy