Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 12GB VRAM RTX A2000 12 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 12 GB +989%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
26
384
Shading Units
3328
32
TMUs
104
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA106
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
12 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy