Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 68W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200 +96%
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
68W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy