Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 +871%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
36
384
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy