Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
13696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +6430%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
14080
32
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy