NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
7808 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+2478%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
DG2-512
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
