Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M +17%
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
384
Shading Units
256
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF100
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy