Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M +17%
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1792MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
256
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF100
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy