Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1165MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro M5500 Mobile +734%
4.772 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1165 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.56 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
149.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.772 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
149.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM204
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy