Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile +419%
2.974 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
35
Quadro P2000 Mobile +560%
231
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
Quadro P2000 Mobile +350%
54
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
384
Shading Units
1152
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP106
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy