NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+1304%
8.033 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+950%
126
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GP104
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
