Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +3856%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
64GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
104
384
Shading Units
6656
32
TMUs
416
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

55W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy