Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M +1171%
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 470
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
System Shared
DDR3
Memory Type
System Shared
128bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.640 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
C79
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
-
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
38W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy