Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M +126%
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro VX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
112
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
252.0 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G92
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy