Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 600W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
13696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300 +8268%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
14080
32
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
880
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
153 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy