NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+3784%
22.22 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
7168
32
TMUs
448
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
204 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
100 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
