Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 45W)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro K620 +164%
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM107
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy