Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 +1999%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM200
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy