Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 180W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000 +2621%
8.873 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1607 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.5GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
192
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
277.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
138.6 GFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.873 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
277.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
180W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP104
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
GP104-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy