Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 40W)
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro P600 +266%
1.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1329 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
192
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP107
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy