Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +1525%
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
1920
16
TMUs
120
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU106
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy