Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 +4903%
16.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
192
Shading Units
4608
16
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU102
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy