Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI50 +4013%
13.41 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
3840
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Vega 20
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy