Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
15808 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550 +6726%
52.43 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
752 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
16384
48
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
100 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy