Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 32GB VRAM Quadro GV100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro GV100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (868.4GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
4544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
Quadro GV100 +2069%
16.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Volta
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1132 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
752 MHz
Memory Clock
848 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
868.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
576
Shading Units
5120
48
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
208.3 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
520.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.32 TFLOPS
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.66 TFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.330 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GV100
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
GV100-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy