Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC +182%
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
752 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GK104
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy