Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090 +73%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
752 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
576
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GF110
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
3 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy