Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
Tesla M2075 +33%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
752 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
576
Shading Units
448
48
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GF110
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-876-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
3 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy