Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA A10M

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA A10M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1635MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
A10M +1528%
23.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
640
Shading Units
7168
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy