Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (68W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +196%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
640
Shading Units
256
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
142W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy