Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +788%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
640
Shading Units
72
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.488 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.46 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
162.0 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

68W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM4
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy