Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
592 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +1033%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
640
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

68W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy