Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +6156%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
640
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

68W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy