Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
592 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +1140%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
640
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

68W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy