Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1543MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile +284%
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
640
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy