Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +282%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK208
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy