Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1124MHz vs 1098MHz)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 68W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200 +2%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2200
127
Quadro M2000M +3%
132
OctaneBench
Quadro K2200
34
Quadro M2000M
34
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
640
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy