Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1124MHz vs 924MHz)
Lower TDP (68W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE +31%
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
823 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
924 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

68W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy