Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1480MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 SXM2 +637%
10.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
640
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP100
-
GPU Variant
GP100-890-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy