Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
18816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +19033%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
19456
40
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
146 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy