Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 450W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
13696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350 +5103%
44.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
14336
40
TMUs
896
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
450W
-
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
100 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy