Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA GRID K520

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA GRID K520

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 4GB VRAM GRID K520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
GRID K520 +168%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy