Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M +75%
0.854 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
640
Shading Units
256
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy