Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +254%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1076 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
640
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy