Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050 +20%
1.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
640
Shading Units
448
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy